Mobility is Driving a Change in Desktop and Application Delivery Trends |
流动性驾驶在桌面上的一个变化,并且应用交付趋向 |
The desktop and application delivery market has experienced tremendous change over the past several years, affecting organizations’ mobility strategies. A wide range of new solutions, devices, and service-based delivery models have proliferated and evolved. This “consumerization of IT” has resulted in a plethora of alternative endpoint devices flooding the corporate landscape. Today’s knowledge worker no longer consumes information solely on a single company-issued device, but rather on a combination of laptops, smartphones, tablets, and thin clients. |
桌面和应用交付市场体验了巨大变动在过去几年,影响组织’流动性战略。 大范围新的解答,设备和基于服务的交付模型激增了并且演变了。 这“consumerization它”导致充斥公司风景的多血症供选择的终点设备。 今天知识劳动者单一地不再消耗信息在一个唯一公司发的设备,但宁可在膝上计算机、smartphones、片剂和小型客户端的组合。 |
Given that, organizations are increasingly embracing a variety of alternative desktop and application delivery models, which often use a combination of software-as-a-service (SaaS), Web-based, and mobile applications for their flexibility, convenience, and ability to scale on demand. |
给出那,组织越来越是拥抱各种各样供选择的桌面和应用交付模型,为他们的灵活性、便利和能力称经常使用软件和服务(SaaS)的组合,基于互联网和流动应用在要求时。 |
Lying at the heart of these alternative desktop and application delivery models is something that can be characterized as a business goal as much as it is an IT headache—namely, the need to meet end-user demand for convenient and reliable access to applications and IT services from any location via any number of devices. |
说谎在这些中心供选择的桌面和应用交付模型是可以被描绘作为企业目标的事,和它它头疼即一样多,需要适应对方便的终端用户需要,并且对应用和它的可靠的通入从所有地点为服务通过设备的任何数字。 |
Previously conducted ESG research found that end-user demand for alternative devices was cited by 44% of respondents as a factor responsible for the changing profile of endpoint device usage among those organizations surveyed.1 |
早先开展的ESG研究发现对供选择的设备的终端用户需求援引44%应答者作为因素负责任对终点设备用法改变的外形在那些组织surveyed.1之中 |
|
While these alternative delivery models are more user-centric, they are also more challenging for IT to manage and keep secure. How? Traditional, manual methods used for supporting, managing, and securing these alternative endpoints on a device-by-device basis—along with numerous and disparate operating systems—are rapidly exhausting IT resources and rendering tactical IT approaches untenable. Without automated processes to monitor, manage, assess, and remediate prospective threats and suspicious or malicious behavior on the network, the enterprise is left virtually unprotected. |
当这些供选择的交付模型是更加用户中心时,他们也是富挑战性为了它能处理和保持安全。 怎么? 为支持,处理和获取这些供选择的终点使用的传统,手工方法在一个设备由设备依据沿以许多和不同经营系统迅速地用尽它资源,并且使作战它接近难防守。 不用自动化的过程对显示器,处理,估计,并且remediate预期威胁和可疑或恶意行为在网络,企业留给实际上无保护。 |
In tactical-focused, hybrid delivery environments, (where a hybrid delivery environment is defined as a combination of traditional, private, and public cloud environments), policies and settings across endpoints and application delivery models fail to propagate. In this scenario, disparate applications and systems live in their own silos, and don’t “talk” to one another. Not only does this create a significant gap in network security, but it also creates a significant gap between business objectives and IT objectives. |
在作战聚焦,杂种交付环境, (一个杂种交付环境被定义作为传统,私有和公开云彩环境的组合)的地方,政策和设置横跨终点和应用交付模型不繁殖。 在这个情景,不同的应用和系统在他们自己的筒仓居住,和“与互相不谈话”。 这不仅创造一个重大空白在网络安全,但它也创造商业目的和它之间的一个重大空白宗旨。 |
While alternative delivery models may allow IT to plug holes and address short-term tactical requirements, a long-term, strategic solution for managing applications and IT services, and how they are delivered to end-users, suffers in the long run. |
当供选择的交付模型也许允许它对塞孔和针对短期作战要求时,长期,战略解答为处理的应用和它为服务和怎么他们被提供到终端用户,从长远看遭受。 |
1Source: ESG Research Report, Mobile Device and Application Usage Trends, August 2013. |
1Source : ESG研究报告、移动设备和应用用法趋向, 2013年8月。 |